NATIONAL EDUCATION: Are there people in Papia Andia for jobs?

Posted on May 24, 2022



There is
+

The 2022 Graduation Specialty Examination which was held about ten days ago has brought the question of teaching mathematics and science to the forefront of the educational scene.

If you think, at the beginning of the year, the math-learning societies were alarmed by the fact that in the new high school, only 59% of students in the final year of the general year were taught math, up from 90% earlier. 2019 High School Reforms. Around the same time, Mediff called for a massive resumption of mathematical, scientific and technical education in schools to urgently train many more undergraduate engineers.

“Let’s not mix everything up,” said Jean-Michel Blanker, a minister in office at the time. With my high school reform, it is no longer a question of teaching mathematics to students as much as possible, but of strengthening the level of students who choose the math specialty after seconds so that they are more broadly directed towards their scientific study. .

However, he acknowledged that it was possible to increase the number of math hours in the general trunk of high school to make it stronger. “Mathematical culture of all students”. And immediately the responsibility of examining this question should be entrusted to the committee formed on this occasion. Subsequently, the Minister recently confirmed that the general origin of “scientific education” will be renamed “scientific and mathematical education” from the beginning of the 2022 school year (very original) and the number of hours given in the first class will increase (surprise, surprise) weekly from 2:00. Until 3:30 p.m.

However, the report of the committee will not be completely useless as, in its analysis and observation, it highlights a number of essential elements which will not fail to attract the attention of the Minister of National Education. I remember three things:

The first is well-known, very disturbing, and has been practiced for years:

The average level of math skills in France has been declining for almost 40 years.

More worryingly, this is the average level of everything that has been in perpetual decline year after year, the latest in a long list of 2019 TIMSS International Mathematical Rankings PISA and other PIRLS that put France at the bottom of the list of comparable countries, without exception.

The second point, related to strengthening the scientific level of the students, is more encouraging:

The reform significantly improved the training of future scientists and created a mathematical elite.

In addition, compared to the old S series (before the 2019 reform), relatively more students are moving towards preparatory studies and scientific studies after graduation. A good result is that both the committee and the minister are responsible for the nature of the new high school’s “a la carte”: because of their preference to compose courses, students use their interest in science rather than the reputation of the former S-sector, which is considered “leading to everything”. Was done.

Yet the committee emphasizes – the third element, and in my opinion the most important – that if the scientific and mathematical levels of high school students who are not experts in the subject are considered too low, the fault lies with the whole school career. From the first level of school and college:

The last link in high school education. This alone does not solve the problem of enormity associated with the decline in the average proficiency level of French students in mathematics for almost 40 years.

A common sense comment that can easily be extended to all topics.

Paap Andiaye, Minister of National Education

At a time when the future of the country is at such a critical juncture and in a very strategic context where so much knowledge and strategy is at stake, can the new Minister of Education, Pap Andy, be the man in this situation?

Initially, his appointment included a clear political dimension to a government that would otherwise be weak and seldom marked with a renewed seal, a reckless appeal with its foot toward voters interested in diversity. The intersection of Jean-Luc Melenchon, in which it is especially difficult to see a serious consideration of the important issues inherent in national education.

Pap Ndiaye is certainly a history graduate and a professor of higher education, but no one doubts that these are his commitment to the left, his work on the black situation, his past links to the Association’s House of Representatives (CRAN), his call for positive discrimination (education). Named equal opportunity in language) and his experience as director of the Museum of Immigration History which was thrown to the left in the three-week legislative election.

Left leg or French universal leg? The whole question is there.

As much as Jean-Michel Blanker, the great destroyer Cancel cultureFrom wokism And just as the widespread Islam-leftism of the university (as we have seen in Sciences Po Grenoble’s work) has become a man to be shot in the rebel ranks, so too will it be difficult for the far left to make the same rebuke. His successor. Outside of the short-term electoral strategy, perhaps this is exactly what Emmanuel Macron wanted: having an education minister who would be difficult to criticize without denying himself at many points to the teacher unions, very marked on the left.

It should be noted that in his handover speech, Pope Ndia immediately placed himself under the symbol of the universal heritage of the French Republic, paying homage to Samuel Patti, a professor of history like him and a victim of Islamist sectarianism, and perhaps describing himself. The dual symbol of talent and diversity, adds (video, 05 ′ 38 ″):

I am not proud of it, but I have a sense of duty and responsibility.

We would like to know how the President was able to persuade him to accept this particularly difficult and open portfolio. After all, at the head of the Immigration Museum, the historian had an ideal position, perfectly aligned with his university work, without the difficulty of daily visibility with millions of French parents, students or teachers.

Moreover, and it is not limited to the question of education, where does the roadmap set by the President of the Republic end and where does the autonomy of Ministers, including the Prime Minister, begin?

At the educational level, we realized that Emanuel Macron wanted to continue at the national level what he had announced for schools in Marseille last September.

He then proposed to convert fifty schools in Marseille into laboratories “School of the Future” From the beginning of 2022 academic year. Step 1: Give school principals the freedom to form their own education teams without relying on the administrative allocation of posts from the ministry.

Step 2:

In these schools, “so we can adapt, learning projects, school rhythms, vacations, lesson times, teaching methods and (I want) what we can start from the beginning of the 2022 school year – 2023. And then evaluate these results and, if They are final, but generalize them[…]Basically, the idea is simple: give more freedom to get more results. (Macron, Marseilles, 02/09/21)

Let’s not get carried away. It is clear that the “freedom” that Emanuel Macron intends to provide for school education must lie within the patchy dermal exclusive narrow chest of national education, in fact the project must be overseen more ideologically and effectively relentlessly.

But obviously, for the teachers’ union, it’s already too much, too much. In other words, the awkwardly over-liberal, as Jean-Luc Melenchon quickly confirmed to us, is less than admirable just two days after the surprise appointment of a new minister:

Could this be Pap Ndiaye’s role in the end? To appease the administration, to appease the unions, to reassure them in the left anchorage and in the defense of the public service of education, to flatter a certain number of egalitarian educational totem, to achieve In the end, And almost secretly, to introduce a tiny dose of freedom into school work?

However, Pap Andia must know one thing: diversity or not, Black study Or not, even in the housing estate, families concerned about their children’s education and integration are starting to run away from public schools. Many parents in disadvantaged neighborhoods are increasingly choosing a private Catholic school near their home to escape the daily confinement of their children’s community and the daily violence of certain playgrounds.

Equivalently.

On the internet

Leave a Comment