Katrina Campbell, a former technology adviser to the UK government and inducted into the British Interactive Media Association’s Digital Hall of Fame, explains in her new book that in the very distant future, those who want to expand their family can choose to use artificial intelligence. He believes that with augmented reality (AR) glasses and haptic gloves, virtual children can be seen and touched, and the settings can be adjusted to make care as realistic or as easy as possible.
The rise of virtual reality has led many people to take refuge in the digital space, creating meaningful virtual relationships. VR / AR headsets have given rise to a new kind of virtual interaction among Internet users that big technology companies now want to integrate into Metaverse. At least we can say that in the last eighteen months, Metavers seems to have become the place of all possibilities. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.
In this regard, Campbell’s book indicates that in virtual reality relationships will one day be so common that virtual children will be normal for couples. As the cost of living has skyrocketed in recent years, couples should adopt virtual children instead of physical children. He explained that this phenomenon would become more common with the development of technologies like Metaverse. Since mixed reality is expected to advance further in the coming decades, many may choose a virtual family.
Campbell based his predictions on the potential difficulties for couples who decide to have children in the second half of this century. In fact, according to the US Department of Agriculture, the average American child costs more than $ 230,000 for his parents when he reaches the age of 17. In contrast, British artificial intelligence experts estimate that a digital child can meet all their needs for less than 25 25 per month or about, 5,100 by the time they graduate from high school. Campbell hints that virtual children will not be free.
In contrast, each child will have a subscription for which parents must pay. If a payment is missed, the parent will withdraw the child. While Campbell estimates that subscription services may cost about $ 25 a month, additional services – such as aging or changing your appearance – may cost more. For this price, a virtual child will have simulated speech with AI algorithms that will allow them to spend more time learning with their parents. Like modern services like Replica, but more advanced, AI will be able to decide its own likes and dislikes.
Faced with poverty, epidemics, climate change and overpopulation, experts fear that an estimated 11 billion people, who will become the world’s population by 2100, will not have the food, health care and other resources they need to survive. According to a YouGov poll conducted in 2020, about 10% of adults have already decided not to have children for these reasons, while 10% will cite the financial impact of such a project. However, the Internet is now ubiquitous, computer-generated children will exist in the metavars and come alive at the touch of a button.
Based on a study of why couples choose not to have children, I think it would be reasonable to expect that 20% of people would actually choose to raise a child instead of an actual child. This game-changing approach can help us solve today’s most pressing problems, says Campbell, whose new book, AI by Design: A Plan for Living with Artificial Intelligence, was published this week. Campbell believes that by 2070, touch gloves will actually help parents feel their virtual children.
AI experts refer to this vision of the future family as the “Tamagochi generation”, referring to the original Phoebe of the 90’s, a tiny digital pet whose owners had to regularly “eat, play” and even “heal”. . But in an advanced virtual reality environment, vibrant children can grow and develop in real time without straining the environment and natural resources. Campbell is actually talking about the first truly eco-friendly children and which could represent the greatest technological advancement of the century.
While virtual kids may seem a bit strange at first glance, this will lead to the first all-digital population. He said it could be one of the greatest technological advances of mankind since the rise of the Bronze Age, due to its potential impact on world population and social change. Technicians further suggest that parents may be more satisfied with virtual babies, as they will have more control over how their digital children are conceived.
Yet, he explains, virtual children’s lifetimes can be pre-programmed, and exist in real time, or allow parents to conveniently “activate” them, according to the children’s needs. However, many compare Campbell’s vision of the future family to that of scientific apostasy. This concept of virtual children captures all the costs and hassles associated with real children (although it may seem insignificant at first glance), but does not provide real benefits. Campbell calls for respect for the environment, but not as much as these virtual universes seem environmental.
In fact, scientists agree that the metavers, as we envision them, require thousands of times more computing power today, meaning more computers, more servers, and more data centers. So far, experience has shown that none of these electronic devices have a positive effect on the climate and even less on humans, especially through radiation and waves. Data centers are so power and water hungry that large hyperscalers need to move toward solutions such as green energy and immersion cooling to reduce their environmental impact.
In response to Campbell’s remarks, many are asking that governments around the world assess the risks associated with metavers and take drastic measures to prevent its development in the case of cryptocurrencies and NFTs in some countries around the world. I don’t understand Metaverse and I think both young and myself are very far-sighted. Outside of what I have now (VR games) I don’t see any real purpose or benefit. Why would anyone really want some virtual family or fake baby? , Asked a critic.
Big business destroys the planet so that the poor do not get a chance to enjoy life outside of their homes, and they try to keep us confined to confined spaces for their comfort. Subscriptions for kids can be silly, a video game or a simulator for training, but in general the metaverse does not fill a hole. They are going to use advertisements to fool the minds of the people and they want this shit, ‘said another. He believes that VR, AR, mixed reality and metavers carry huge risks for the survival of humanity.
Finally, Campbell added that virtual children can be used as a tool for parents to test their chances of having children before creating a real child, or to help parents find families they don’t have. Otherwise it would have been possible. As Metaverse develops, I see virtual children becoming a recognized and fully recognized part of society in most developed countries, “Campbell said.
Source: Katrina Campbell (Design by AI: A Plan for Living with Artificial Intelligence)
What is your opinion about it?
What do you think of Campbell’s predictions for the future of the family?
Do you think this could be a solution to overpopulation?
Do you think virtual children will have less of an impact on climate than real children?
Do you claim that metavers are dangerous for the survival of mankind?
Should Metavers development be banned? Why?
See side by side
Investors are paying millions for virtual land in Metaverse as the price of plots has risen by 500% in recent months.
PlayStation inventors find Metavers ‘uninteresting’, adding that VR and AR headsets are ‘just annoying’
Whistleblower Francis Haugen has called on Mark Zuckerberg to resign and invest more in security, instead of sacrificing resources at Metavers.
Yuga Labs has raised about 5 285 million in cryptocurrency by selling land-representing tokens in a virtual world game that it is creating.
Turkey bans use of cryptocurrency to pay for goods and services: Towards global repression of states against Bitcoin and other cryptographic currencies?